PDA

View Full Version : Stupid American sues bike shop for 'having to use the front brakes'



Road Warrior
07-09-2009, 10:18 AM
I honestly don't know what to say.

http://www.motorcycledaily.com/28august09_frontbrake.htm


Don't use them front brakes, son," is what Beaumont, Texas' Daryl L. James' daddy must have said to him when he was a tot. That sparked a chain of events that ended July 30 with a court filing, with James suing his motorcycle shop for negligence when he was "forced to utilize the front brakes," according to the lawsuit.

Information is scanty. Apparently, James dropped off his 2005 Kawasaki Vulcan 2000 to have the rear tire repaired or replaced. He paid for the work and rode out of the parking lot to merge onto I-10 North's frontage road. When he attempted to stop before turning onto the road, he discovered the rear brake didn't work (we're guessing because the mechanic didn't pump the brake pedal after he re-installed the rear wheel), so he was "forced" to use that most dangerous of instrumentalities, the front brake. Really, Daryl? The Vulcan 2K has excellent front brakes: dual four-piston calipers and 300mm discs, but they're hardly roadracer sensitive. Anyway, he must have grabbed that front brake, because the bike allegedly overturned and James went down, suffering "physical pain, suffering, physical impairment, loss of earnings, disfigurement and mental anguish," according to the lawsuit.

James' circumstances highlight the need for basic motorcycle training, which is now mandatory in Texas. The Motorcycle Safety Foundation's Basic RiderCourse teaches two basic skills that might have had James avoid this tragedy. First, doing a basic function check-including brakes-is crucial before each ride. Second, the BRC shows riders how to use both brakes, every time they stop and slow, dispelling any lingering ideas of the front brakes being inherently dangerous. Used properly, they're roughly 70 percent of a motorcycle's stopping power, and are there to prevent-not cause-physical pain, anguish, and all those other expensive damages James is claiming.

Gawsh darn it Jethro why is the ferunt braker bigger than ther back on', y'all dun need it!

nnickn
07-09-2009, 02:24 PM
Unfortunately natural selection overlooked Daryl and his lawyer, what a pity.

XUV
07-09-2009, 02:32 PM
yeah , it's amazing how many don't use the front brake ,
must be those bad experiences on the malvern star drgsters , when turning a corner .
Anyway ,how else are you meant to do endos rolling up to the traffic lights :goodjob:

zorro
07-09-2009, 03:05 PM
Anyway ,how else are you meant to do endos rolling up to the traffic lights :goodjob:

:lmao: good point

Im rarely use the rear brakes when on a road bike, just dont see the point the fronts plus compression braking do well enough. Dirt bikes though is another thing... depends on your style I suppose.

:lol: what a clown though

fatbob
07-09-2009, 03:39 PM
Heh, I went arse over tit the other week cos my wife bought some pushbike has disk brakes on it ( seriously, on a push bike ) - they actually work like instant. I want to sue someone for my stupidity - my dad told me when i was a kid, to always stop for old ladies crossing the road, and I saw one in my peripheral vision, and stopped - but noone told me the brakes nowadays are better than when I was a kid - who can I sue ?
Oh, and I dropped a piece of bread which landed butter side down - again ! Its either the bread manufacturers fault, the butter makers, or because at school I wasn't taught how to drop bread properly - not sure who to sue again ?

Road Warrior
07-09-2009, 04:54 PM
Its either the bread manufacturers fault, the butter makers, or because at school I wasn't taught how to drop bread properly - not sure who to sue again ?

Its the floor maker's fault, for putting the floor there in the first place.

HURF DURF HURRRR