PDA

View Full Version : Thoughts on E10 vs 98 vs 91



andy1742
24-09-2012, 10:52 AM
So i have only used 98 in my VE SS and but is there a noticeable difference in using 91 or E10 or is it bad for the engine? or is it a myth that E10 slowly destroys a higher performance car.

macca_779
24-09-2012, 11:38 AM
Ahh yeah it's a myth. Ethanol is awesome


Sent from my iPhone 5 using Tapatalk

gmh308
24-09-2012, 04:14 PM
One of the shops in Melbourne did a comparison set of dynos. E10 was embaressingly good for power almost trumping 98. From memory Rob Vickery HPF.

team illucid
24-09-2012, 04:15 PM
Isn't E10 more expensive than 98?
Sent from my Windows 8 Tablet

Woodchukka
24-09-2012, 04:21 PM
Isn't E10 more expensive than 98?
Sent from my Windows 8 Tablet

E10 is heaps cheaper than 98. Cheaper than normal 91.

Sent from my GT-I9100T using Tapatalk 2

S_M_I_D_D_Y
24-09-2012, 04:41 PM
One of the shops in Melbourne did a comparison set of dynos. E10 was embaressingly good for power almost trumping 98. From memory Rob Vickery HPF.
http://www.ozgarage.com.au/season1-video/episode-10-now-online-the-fuel-test
Enjoy.

also, e85 testing for those interested
http://www.ozgarage.com.au/season2-video/s2-episode-6-online-e85-fuel

swingtan
24-09-2012, 05:04 PM
I've said it before and I'll say it again.....

In terms of "Bang for Buck"

91<---95--E10-----E10(with tune to suit)->98

I'm currently evaluating my fuel choices. I think I'll be going to an Ethanol blend as I've taken 98 about as far as I can on the tune. It's a pity Shell got rid of E10 as I'd be running it in the SIDI if it was available.

Simon

macca_779
24-09-2012, 05:08 PM
United 100 doesn't interest you Simon? Or better yet eflex


Sent from my iPhone 5 using Tapatalk

Toddler78
24-09-2012, 05:14 PM
Aparently tt did a test a while bac on the cons of fuel pricing and although e10 was the cheaper of the fuels compared to 95 and 98 it consistently tested at 96 Ron so maybe worth considering


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

motorin on
24-09-2012, 06:40 PM
E10 may be cheaper but I have always thought consumption was higher than using 95 or 98 due to the lower octane rating

S_M_I_D_D_Y
24-09-2012, 06:49 PM
e10 is higher octane than 95, closer or even above 98. consumption is very slightly more, because the ethanol contains oxygen so needs more fuel to compensate. but this will not be enough to oughtweigh the $$$ saved over using 98

motorin on
24-09-2012, 07:14 PM
e10 is higher octane than 95, closer or even above 98. consumption is very slightly more, because the ethanol contains oxygen so needs more fuel to compensate. but this will not be enough to oughtweigh the $$$ saved over using 98
Do I need a retune or will the car adjust over time for the change of fuel,usually run 95 with the rare tank of 98

brasher
24-09-2012, 07:29 PM
eflex is the bomb! it's a shame it's not more popular. 2 years of nothing but eflex running in my car and loves the stuff. Drives much better than 98.

S_M_I_D_D_Y
24-09-2012, 08:06 PM
Do I need a retune or will the car adjust over time for the change of fuel,usually run 95 with the rare tank of 98
You dont NEED to retune, but i suppose a tune would give the maximum benifit


eflex is the bomb! it's a shame it's not more popular. 2 years of nothing but eflex running in my car and loves the stuff. Drives much better than 98.
Pretty keen on eflex myself, the only problem being there are only 3 service stations in Newcastle area who sell it and outside Newcastle im not sure its available except sydney.
Can anybody tell me other locations i can get it? expecially close to eastern ck, whats the closest servo? cheers

macca_779
24-09-2012, 08:13 PM
You dont NEED to retune, but i suppose a tune would give the maximum benifit


Pretty keen on eflex myself, the only problem being there are only 3 service stations in Newcastle area who sell it and outside Newcastle im not sure its available except sydney.
Can anybody tell me other locations i can get it? expecially close to eastern ck, whats the closest servo? cheers

O your poor baby lol. 3 servos. Fark I'd be happy with 1


Sent from my iPhone 5 using Tapatalk

bozodos
24-09-2012, 08:16 PM
We have United 100 here, I was initially keen on it, as I drive past the servo every day, but my tuner reccommended against it due to the fuel being inconsistent and going off quicker?

S_M_I_D_D_Y
24-09-2012, 08:18 PM
hahaha yeah well i say 3, 2 of those are over a hour round trip out of my way and the other one only has eflex half the time so its a little inconvinient

awesome _vzss
24-09-2012, 09:21 PM
You dont NEED to retune, but i suppose a tune would give the maximum benifit


Pretty keen on eflex myself, the only problem being there are only 3 service stations in Newcastle area who sell it and outside Newcastle im not sure its available except sydney.
Can anybody tell me other locations i can get it? expecially close to eastern ck, whats the closest servo? cheers

If your talkin about eastern creek in western Sydney, there is a servo about 5 minutes up the road of the great western hwy.
Thats where I usually fill up with eflex and love it

redvxr8clubby
24-09-2012, 09:36 PM
You dont NEED to retune, but i suppose a tune would give the maximum benifit


Pretty keen on eflex myself, the only problem being there are only 3 service stations in Newcastle area who sell it and outside Newcastle im not sure its available except sydney.
Can anybody tell me other locations i can get it? expecially close to eastern ck, whats the closest servo? cheers

There is one on the Great Western Highway at Girraween - Caltex - City bound, top of the hill after Greystanes Rd.

swingtan
24-09-2012, 09:40 PM
United 100 doesn't interest you Simon? Or better yet eflex


Sent from my iPhone 5 using Tapatalk

Yes, it does. I was going to try it a while back, but got sidetracked. Maybe I'll start next tank, will need to re-program the WB to suit E85 though. At least the stock injectors should just handle the increase in flow rate required.

awesome _vzss
24-09-2012, 09:43 PM
There is one on the Great Western Highway at Girraween - Caltex - City bound, top of the hill after Greystanes Rd.

Yeah that's the one I got to and was talking about.
Also the price of eflex there is usually pretty cheap compared to others I go to.

awesome _vzss
24-09-2012, 09:43 PM
Also this with that servo the blend has been pretty consistent with no less than 80% ethanol.

MR57SS
24-09-2012, 10:15 PM
So your saying that E10 is better then 95 octane fuel? Is that for tuned or stock cars?

Ps current car is a 2010 SIDI SV6

Sent from my GT-I9300T using Tapatalk 2

Woodchukka
24-09-2012, 11:35 PM
So your saying that E10 is better then 95 octane fuel? Is that for tuned or stock cars?

Ps current car is a 2010 SIDI SV6

Sent from my GT-I9300T using Tapatalk 2

I keep track of fuel economy in my car (VYII) and found 95 gave a bit better fuel economy than E10 enough to nearly offset the price difference. So the 95 works more efficiently in my car than the E10. Now my car is not tuned so I would say to get the benefit out of E10 you would need a tune for sure.

LuisS
25-09-2012, 06:35 AM
Did the BP98 vs United 100 experiment on a customer's car , the results were pretty disappointing to say the least.

No where near as knock tolerant , and a loss of power & torque right across the rev range even after tuning .

Steer clear. Eflex /E85 on the other hand :nyuk:

S_M_I_D_D_Y
25-09-2012, 07:21 AM
I have heard it is possible to add the ve style ethanol sensor to a earlier model commodore for running eflex , e85, 98 all with 1 tune. Is this correct? What tuners might have experience with this setup in the Newcastle to Sydney area

brasher
25-09-2012, 07:39 AM
I have heard it is possible to add the ve style ethanol sensor to a earlier model commodore for running eflex , e85, 98 all with 1 tune. Is this correct? What tuners might have experience with this setup in the Newcastle to Sydney area



well I know you can incorporate the GM sensor into the new haltechs, but not sure on putting the sensor onto an older holden ECM.

bozodos
25-09-2012, 08:23 AM
What about the E38 PCM on the VZ L76?

Xjas
25-09-2012, 08:42 AM
I was under the impression that the VE doesnt use an ethanol sensor, I thought they use the fuel level to determine when you've filled up and then recaluclate the % ethanol by monitoring the STFTs, I could be wrong on that though.

macca_779
25-09-2012, 08:44 AM
I was under the impression that the VE doesnt use an ethanol sensor, I thought they use the fuel level to determine when you've filled up and then recaluclate the % ethanol by monitoring the STFTs, I could be wrong on that though.

No that's how the US cars do it. Ours have a physical sensor. Much better our way.


Sent from my iPhone 5 using Tapatalk

S_M_I_D_D_Y
25-09-2012, 09:12 AM
Actually now that i think of it, in a recent issue of street commodores ( the one with gups 700ish ci clubby on cover) there is a ls1 VL with fuelab ethanol sensors. Does anyone know more about this setup? Stock pcm possible to do this?

Brett SS
25-09-2012, 10:10 AM
Did the BP98 vs United 100 experiment on a customer's car , the results were pretty disappointing to say the least.

No where near as knock tolerant , and a loss of power & torque right across the rev range even after tuning .

Steer clear. Eflex /E85 on the other hand :nyuk:

Good to hear you found the same results as me. I tried 98 v's United 100 and the E10 stuff would knock easier and make less power with my blown combo.

I spent the time to re-tune to the correct stoich ratio and adjust timing etc as best I could but it just didn't work as well as 98, so I won't be going there again. Am keen to give E85 a crack one day though but we will see.

redvxr8clubby
25-09-2012, 08:08 PM
I was thinking with E10 and 91 that 91 was better overall, while I was aware of the knock resistance supposed to better with E10, I was assuming as the power generated per litre of E10 is less than 91, that it wasn't worth the few cents that are saved, so in my SIDI SV6, and Fiesta I have been trying to stick with 91 where available, but sometimes use E10 if I can't find 91 at the time. Sounds like I should be using E10 for these cars at least. I'll stick with 95 or 98 for the VX Clubby.

Woodchukka
25-09-2012, 09:53 PM
I was thinking with E10 and 91 that 91 was better overall, while I was aware of the knock resistance supposed to better with E10, I was assuming as the power generated per litre of E10 is less than 91, that it wasn't worth the few cents that are saved, so in my SIDI SV6, and Fiesta I have been trying to stick with 91 where available, but sometimes use E10 if I can't find 91 at the time. Sounds like I should be using E10 for these cars at least. I'll stick with 95 or 98 for the VX Clubby.

Best way to tell what is better to run is if you have a route that you used a lot like going to work measure fuel consumption for 3 or 4 tanks on one fuel then the same for the other. Don't worry about recording the price as the difference between E10 and 91 is about the same so lust pick a day and record to evaluate once you have your measurements. FYI I record the litres put in and trip km's as the calculator on the dash is not 100% accurate. Do that and then you will know for sure.

Kuzman89
26-09-2012, 09:42 AM
So what about 98 vs united100??

Made the switch a couple days ago, honestly can't tell the difference, price is roughly the same. Would this suit boost better?

Reading all these posts, not everyone has the same experience. Seems to be hit and miss as far as your own setup goes.

Woodchukka
26-09-2012, 10:15 AM
So what about 98 vs united100??

Made the switch a couple days ago, honestly can't tell the difference, price is roughly the same. Would this suit boost better?

Reading all these posts, not everyone has the same experience. Seems to be hit and miss as far as your own setup goes.

Read post 25 and 32.

MrBerlina
26-09-2012, 10:44 AM
Eflex /E85 on the other hand :nyuk:

My new drag motor will be running E85. Seems like a fantastic fuel for a lower maintenance, full power effort.

Kuzman89
27-09-2012, 08:20 AM
Second tank now, and it does seem to respond better to united 100. At idle the car doesn't jolt as much and it seems alot smoother, doesn't struggle as much upto 8psi boost either. My last few tanks have been Vortex 98 from Caltex. So unsure how it would go against BP ultimate.

macca_779
28-09-2012, 07:55 PM
Second tank now, and it does seem to respond better to united 100. At idle the car doesn't jolt as much and it seems alot smoother, doesn't struggle as much upto 8psi boost either. My last few tanks have been Vortex 98 from Caltex. So unsure how it would go against BP ultimate.

Personally I rate vortex 98 better than ultimate. It's always ran good for me, whereas ultimate has been hit and miss for me in the past. Although it has been a while since I used ultimate. I can use shopper dockets for vortex, which is another incentive.


Sent from my iPad 2 using Tapatalk HD

Phillshz
28-09-2012, 08:01 PM
I've said it before and I'll say it again.....

In terms of "Bang for Buck"

91<---95--E10-----E10(with tune to suit)->98

I'm currently evaluating my fuel choices. I think I'll be going to an Ethanol blend as I've taken 98 about as far as I can on the tune. It's a pity Shell got rid of E10 as I'd be running it in the SIDI if it was available.

Simon

Simon, Shell has E10 in Sydney (as do all the other servo`s whether independant or not) i was unaware E10 was being rolled back though i have heard rumours due to it being avoided by the majority of people who pick overpriced 95 instead.
ACA IIRC just recently did a test of E10 from different brands and areas arund Sydney, they all returned a reading of 94.5 RON

Cheers Phill

macca_779
28-09-2012, 08:03 PM
Simon, Shell has E10 in Sydney (as do all the other servo`s whether independant or not) i was unaware E10 was being rolled back though i have heard rumours due to it being avoided by the majority of people who pick overpriced 95 instead.
ACA IIRC just recently did a test of E10 from different brands and areas arund Sydney, they all returned a reading of 94.5 RON

Cheers Phill

Simons taking about the vpower e10. Not the 91 Ron e10 which is common everywhere.


Sent from my iPad 2 using Tapatalk HD

Phillshz
28-09-2012, 08:41 PM
Oh Ok, Gotcha :burnout:

swingtan
28-09-2012, 09:06 PM
Actually, it's ALL E10 from Shell in Victoria. There is nothing with Ethanol in a Shell servo here, it's almost like they spat the dummy when they lost the V8 Super Car fueling (V-Power Racing ) and decided to get rid of anything with Ethanol. I'd love to be running it in the 3.0L SIDI motor as I reckon it's work well, but as it's a fleet car and comes with a Shell card, I'm stuck on 91, which is slightly better than Mountain Dew ( but not as good as Crab Juice ).

I'm set to recalibrate the TechEdge WB controller and the LA1 gauge to read correctly for E85, so I'll give that a go in the 6Lt. At a really quick calculation for AFR and peak IDC, I may not have the head room I need. For E85, max power is gained from between 6.975:1 and 8.469:1 AFR ( theoretical ), so splitting the two and aiming at 7.7 and with my current peak IDC around 60% for 12.6:1, I'm going to be pushing 97% IDC on E85......

Simon.

redvxr8clubby
29-09-2012, 09:20 AM
Interesting about the rollback, a week ago I was travelling back from Brisbane to Sydney and stopped in a BP servo to fill up just north of Kempsey and noticed they have converted the pumps from E10 back to 91, usually BP seem to have E10. In Sydney E10 is much more common than 91.