HPF Head & Cam or HPF Supercharger

[WPNLS1]

I have been looking around for the next mods for my ute and i have been recomended to hpf and as far as i can see there are 2 mods i can go to next:
the hpf supercharger kit for around 5 grand or
the hpf head and cam pack also around 5 grand

what are the veiws on both of these packages and which one should go for.

[KPWISHN]

Post up some of your current mods for a start.:idea:

[macca33]

Well both have advantages and disadvantages.

For both you'll need a good exhaust/headers to make them work to their best potential.

Disadvantages as far as I can see:-

Blower - no more stock engine bay, more components, may not live up to your expectations.

H/C - no more stock idle, emissions may be a concern, you cannot change it over if you sell the car without mucking about, may not live up to your expectations.

IMO - Go Head/Cam.

Cheers,

Macca

[EVLCV8]

I'd say go head & cam........I've done cam only, head & cam, blown and turbo and I will never fit a charger again as breaking blower belts every few weeks gets annoyin but never had a problem with head & cam combo and was great for power espically with HPF's grinds.

[HSVJPL]

I'd go the blower path.

To get anywhere near the power a good S/C set up you will need an aggressive cam which may make the car a little unfriendly on the street.

A well tuned S/C set up will have a stock idle and stock-like economy until you give it a boot full.

Also it is easier to remove the S/C kit to return the car to stock comparedf to a H/C package.

[furys8]

go the cam package less stress on the engine,i just got a cam fitted last week to my ute a4 outcome of 269 rwkw with standard heads.:woohoo:

[furys8]

go the cam package less stress on the engine,i just got a cam fitted last week to my ute a4 outcome of 269 rwkw with standard heads.:woohoo: also done by hpf .