hahaha yeah well i say 3, 2 of those are over a hour round trip out of my way and the other one only has eflex half the time so its a little inconvinient
We have United 100 here, I was initially keen on it, as I drive past the servo every day, but my tuner reccommended against it due to the fuel being inconsistent and going off quicker?
hahaha yeah well i say 3, 2 of those are over a hour round trip out of my way and the other one only has eflex half the time so its a little inconvinient
If you're going paint a target on your self, expect some special attention....
Also this with that servo the blend has been pretty consistent with no less than 80% ethanol.
Last edited by awesome _vzss; 24-09-2012 at 09:46 PM.
SENT FROM OUTER SPACE!!!!
So your saying that E10 is better then 95 octane fuel? Is that for tuned or stock cars?
Ps current car is a 2010 SIDI SV6
GT-I9300T 2
I keep track of fuel economy in my car (VYII) and found 95 gave a bit better fuel economy than E10 enough to nearly offset the price difference. So the 95 works more efficiently in my car than the E10. Now my car is not tuned so I would say to get the benefit out of E10 you would need a tune for sure.
Did the BP98 vs United 100 experiment on a customer's car , the results were pretty disappointing to say the least.
No where near as knock tolerant , and a loss of power & torque right across the rev range even after tuning .
Steer clear. Eflex /E85 on the other hand![]()
I have heard it is possible to add the ve style ethanol sensor to a earlier model commodore for running eflex , e85, 98 all with 1 tune. Is this correct? What tuners might have experience with this setup in the Newcastle to Sydney area
What about the E38 PCM on the VZ L76?
I was under the impression that the VE doesnt use an ethanol sensor, I thought they use the fuel level to determine when you've filled up and then recaluclate the % ethanol by monitoring the STFTs, I could be wrong on that though.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)