Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 52

Thread: Anyone using a HM Headers Exhaust? or Walkinshaw?

  1. #16
    sjhugh is offline Forum Contributor Last Online: 19-05-2023 @ 11:52 PM
    Member Since
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Sydney & Central Coast
    Posts
    1,042

    Re: Anyone using a HM Headers Exhaust? or Walkinshaw?

    Quote Originally Posted by macca_779 View Post
    I think your delusional if you think you can make it sound like the 6.2 Merc.

    Agreed.


    Quote Originally Posted by Huthy77 View Post
    I was so hesitant about any system, but did the research and spoke to "Walkinshaw", and then HM to clarify what was what, and what the end result would be like! Personally, when I described my "ideal" note, it was "AMG C63 loaded up!"... Nice a quite, but turned heads to hear that sophisticated sound when pulling away... So far, with the mid section I reckon I won't be too far off that when the rears arrive... The system is a direct bolt-up, so at least I can play around with the HM and Stock rear/mids to achive the note (and no drone) that I want...
    Quote Originally Posted by aaron1828 View Post
    Hey there i think if u after the exhaust sounding most similar to the c63 amg i reckon the walkinshaw is the closest sounding system out there. I have linked two vids for comparison, i think the walkinshaw has a similar bark/crack noise as the stock c63 when reving, unique sound.

    I think you’ll be pushing sh#t up hill.

    The 63 has a distinctive mechanical sound that forms part of the exhaust noise.
    The 6.2 AMG internals are so far removed from that of a GM engine, the sound won’t ever be replicated by playing around with a mix and match HM exhaust system.

    .

  2. #17
    Doco is offline Occasional Contributor to the Forums Last Online: 19-08-2013 @ 12:38 AM
    Member Since
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    183

    Re: Anyone using a HM Headers Exhaust? or Walkinshaw?

    This thread has deviated somewhat, I never said I wanted it to sound like a C63, just louder than stock, no drone and legal.

  3. #18
    mattnsw is offline Occasional Contributor to the Forums Last Online: 17-11-2016 @ 05:24 PM
    Member Since
    Jun 2008
    Location
    outer sydney
    Posts
    282

    Re: Anyone using a HM Headers Exhaust? or Walkinshaw?

    Quote Originally Posted by Doco View Post
    louder than stock, no drone and legal.
    Do they offer you a guarantee that the noise level and emissions are legal?

    Of cause not, you’re keeping your hi flow cats and pacemaker extractors, you’re illegal before you start.

    .

  4. #19
    Roonstain's Avatar
    Roonstain is offline Fair Contributor to the Forums Last Online: 04-10-2023 @ 08:50 PM
    Member Since
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Wollongong
    Age
    35
    Posts
    1,691

    Re: Anyone using a HM Headers Exhaust? or Walkinshaw?

    Louder than stock and legal aint gonna happen! They only just scrape under the 90dB from factory

  5. #20
    Doco is offline Occasional Contributor to the Forums Last Online: 19-08-2013 @ 12:38 AM
    Member Since
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    183

    Re: Anyone using a HM Headers Exhaust? or Walkinshaw?

    This from the Pacemaker website

    7) Will headers make my car louder?
    The simple answer to this is 'no'. Headers by nature do not increase the Db range by themselves. The main reason for any exhaust system to increase the sound level is found in the choice of mufflers. Car manufacturers choose to use very restrictive but sound efficient reverse flow mufflers. These mufflers are very effective in reducing noise levels but also are very restrictive in flow. Some after market mufflers are very good in producing a high flow rate while still remaining within the law. Other mufflers are just too small in shape or too big in pipe diameter to do the job of effectively quieting the vehicles emissions. All customers wishing to alter their vehicles exhaust system should check with their states regulatory authority and work with reputable exhaust shops. Headers however do deepen the sound of the note of the exhaust. Much like a flute, if the pulse travelling down the barrel is allowed to escape through the first hole a high pitch is audible, however if the same pulse is allowed to complete the journey to the end, a much deeper note is heard. Headers by their design will have longer tubes than a standard manifold, creating a deeper note.



    Quote Originally Posted by mattnsw View Post
    Do they offer you a guarantee that the noise level and emissions are legal?

    Of cause not, you’re keeping your hi flow cats and pacemaker extractors, you’re illegal before you start.

    .

  6. #21
    jaykay's Avatar
    jaykay is offline Powertrain Control Last Online: 09-04-2021 @ 12:41 PM
    Member Since
    May 2006
    Location
    Gold Coast
    Posts
    10,286

    Re: Anyone using a HM Headers Exhaust? or Walkinshaw?

    Quote Originally Posted by Doco View Post
    This from the Pacemaker website

    7) Will headers make my car louder?
    The simple answer to this is 'no'. Headers by nature do not increase the Db range by themselves. The main reason for any exhaust system to increase the sound level is found in the choice of mufflers. Car manufacturers choose to use very restrictive but sound efficient reverse flow mufflers. These mufflers are very effective in reducing noise levels but also are very restrictive in flow. Some after market mufflers are very good in producing a high flow rate while still remaining within the law. Other mufflers are just too small in shape or too big in pipe diameter to do the job of effectively quieting the vehicles emissions. All customers wishing to alter their vehicles exhaust system should check with their states regulatory authority and work with reputable exhaust shops. Headers however do deepen the sound of the note of the exhaust. Much like a flute, if the pulse travelling down the barrel is allowed to escape through the first hole a high pitch is audible, however if the same pulse is allowed to complete the journey to the end, a much deeper note is heard. Headers by their design will have longer tubes than a standard manifold, creating a deeper note.
    There was this one time...at band camp....

  7. #22
    Doco is offline Occasional Contributor to the Forums Last Online: 19-08-2013 @ 12:38 AM
    Member Since
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    183

    Re: Anyone using a HM Headers Exhaust? or Walkinshaw?

    Haha... a little long winded?


    Quote Originally Posted by jkgmh View Post
    There was this one time...at band camp....

  8. #23
    jaykay's Avatar
    jaykay is offline Powertrain Control Last Online: 09-04-2021 @ 12:41 PM
    Member Since
    May 2006
    Location
    Gold Coast
    Posts
    10,286

    Re: Anyone using a HM Headers Exhaust? or Walkinshaw?

    Quote Originally Posted by Doco View Post
    Haha... a little long winded?
    No the post was good, just couldn't resist the flute implication

  9. #24
    Doco is offline Occasional Contributor to the Forums Last Online: 19-08-2013 @ 12:38 AM
    Member Since
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    183

    Re: Anyone using a HM Headers Exhaust? or Walkinshaw?

    I didnt actually read the whole thing... answered my question in the first sentence.

    I've just got off the phone to an RTA approved engineer, and basically, unless your entire system is ADR approved (which it wont be unless stock) then you're a chance of being done.

    He said on late model cars, the emmisions are so tight, even an airbox will breach the EPA guidlines as it alters emissions.

    The rules and governing bodies here are a mess, I'm more confused now than I was before. Might just throw the stock airbox back on and pull the pacemakers off while I'm at it... anyone want to swap pacies for stockies?



    Quote Originally Posted by jkgmh View Post
    No the post was good, just couldn't resist the flute implication

  10. #25
    mattnsw is offline Occasional Contributor to the Forums Last Online: 17-11-2016 @ 05:24 PM
    Member Since
    Jun 2008
    Location
    outer sydney
    Posts
    282

    Re: Anyone using a HM Headers Exhaust? or Walkinshaw?

    Quote Originally Posted by Doco View Post
    This from the Pacemaker website

    7) Will headers make my car louder?
    The simple answer to this is 'no'. Headers by nature do not increase the Db range by themselves. The main reason for any exhaust system to increase the sound level is found in the choice of mufflers. Car manufacturers choose to use very restrictive but sound efficient reverse flow mufflers. These mufflers are very effective in reducing noise levels but also are very restrictive in flow. Some after market mufflers are very good in producing a high flow rate while still remaining within the law. Other mufflers are just too small in shape or too big in pipe diameter to do the job of effectively quieting the vehicles emissions. All customers wishing to alter their vehicles exhaust system should check with their states regulatory authority and work with reputable exhaust shops. Headers however do deepen the sound of the note of the exhaust. Much like a flute, if the pulse travelling down the barrel is allowed to escape through the first hole a high pitch is audible, however if the same pulse is allowed to complete the journey to the end, a much deeper note is heard. Headers by their design will have longer tubes than a standard manifold, creating a deeper note.
    Is that your guarantee there won’t be an increase in sound from the Pacemakers?
    Where the guarantee on emissions?
    Now team the pacemakers with the high flow cats.
    Like most of us, your exhaust is illegal.


    You’re obviously concerned about a whole range of implications in regard to aftermarket modifications.
    You’re got a number of threads running at the moment asking questions in regard to legal and illegal mods. This one is just an extension of your mechanic/insurance one.
    You’re not telling the forum members anything new and as you’ve been a member since Jan 2005, I would have thought you’d have picked up on the legalities of some aftermarket equipment long before now.
    Police and the EPA can get you anytime they wish. The insurance company when you make a claim.
    It’s all a risk and a part of modding your car is accepting the cost if caught.
    Or don’t do it at all.

  11. #26
    SSVHM2.5 is offline Occasional Contributor to the Forums Last Online: 21-04-2016 @ 02:38 PM
    Member Since
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Mont Albert
    Posts
    189

    Re: Anyone using a HM Headers Exhaust? or Walkinshaw?

    Dam it, lets just all purchase a Prius and get from "A" to "B" like every other tool on the road. Is it possible to have any fun any more??? What is it we can do then??? I can go to a legal business and purchase all the go fast goodies I want but once they are on a car you cannot actually drive it..........

  12. #27
    Doco is offline Occasional Contributor to the Forums Last Online: 19-08-2013 @ 12:38 AM
    Member Since
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    183

    Re: Anyone using a HM Headers Exhaust? or Walkinshaw?

    Mate, I'm just asking questions to find out where I stand, and those questions apply to everyone on here. Yes, I joined in 2005, but I've only just recently been active because I only recent;ly bought another Holden.

    Apologies if you're finding my posts annoying, but this stuff isn't obvious, you can easily be driving around in an illegal vehicle and be none the wiser.



    Quote Originally Posted by mattnsw View Post
    Is that your guarantee there won’t be an increase in sound from the Pacemakers?
    Where the guarantee on emissions?
    Now team the pacemakers with the high flow cats.
    Like most of us, your exhaust is illegal.


    You’re obviously concerned about a whole range of implications in regard to aftermarket modifications.
    You’re got a number of threads running at the moment asking questions in regard to legal and illegal mods. This one is just an extension of your mechanic/insurance one.
    You’re not telling the forum members anything new and as you’ve been a member since Jan 2005, I would have thought you’d have picked up on the legalities of some aftermarket equipment long before now.
    Police and the EPA can get you anytime they wish. The insurance company when you make a claim.
    It’s all a risk and a part of modding your car is accepting the cost if caught.
    Or don’t do it at all.

  13. #28
    Huthy77 is offline Occasional Contributor to the Forums Last Online: 08-05-2021 @ 09:23 PM
    Member Since
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Brisbane
    Age
    47
    Posts
    143

    Re: Anyone using a HM Headers Exhaust? or Walkinshaw?

    Quote Originally Posted by sjhugh View Post
    Agreed.

    I think you’ll be pushing sh#t up hill.

    The 63 has a distinctive mechanical sound that forms part of the exhaust noise.
    The 6.2 AMG internals are so far removed from that of a GM engine, the sound won’t ever be replicated by playing around with a mix and match HM exhaust system.
    .
    Yeah, I know I'll never replicate the AMG, but when you walk into an exhaust/tune shop, and like any good one should, they try and get an understanding of what you are looking for, and what you'll be happy with! Power vs Sound or Both? Mild, or Wild? Towncar or Racecar? Well, I was just upfront, and said "I'd love hear the AMG"... Quite on idle/cruise, noise out the back of the car, and not through it! I'm realistic, but it seems to be a common "language" and sound that everyone knows!

    I'd never say I want the "Snappy/Barky" Xforce, or tell them I want a Hyundai Excel with 4" Hotdogs lighting up the tyres at the lights after the first rain shower!

    So the AMG dream it is....

  14. #29
    LuisS is offline Forum Contributor Last Online: 12-03-2025 @ 08:42 AM
    Member Since
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Victoria
    Age
    58
    Posts
    734

    Re: Anyone using a HM Headers Exhaust? or Walkinshaw?

    Re. not being able to pass emissions etc with exhaust -

    Rubbish , it can be done . We've done it using a HM system.

    http://www.ls1.com.au/forum/showthre...amp-the-future

  15. #30
    Doco is offline Occasional Contributor to the Forums Last Online: 19-08-2013 @ 12:38 AM
    Member Since
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    183

    Re: Anyone using a HM Headers Exhaust? or Walkinshaw?

    Hi Luis,

    I read your thread, great to see. I would have contacted you guys if you were in Syd,

    I'm taking my ute in tomorrow, removing the pacemakers, removing the cai, removing the outlaw cats and xforce catback. Replacing with current model HSV extractors, euro 4 cats, and HM headers catback, also putting back the stock airbox. I'm hoping, this combination will bring emissions in check and also db levels.

    People on here have said, a stock SS or right on the db allowance, which can't be true, as HSV also hae to abide by the same restrictions, and they sound better than a standard SS.


    Quote Originally Posted by APS Luis View Post
    Re. not being able to pass emissions etc with exhaust -

    Rubbish , it can be done . We've done it using a HM system.

    http://www.ls1.com.au/forum/showthre...amp-the-future

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. F/S VY1 R8 stainless exhaust & HM headers
    By adam woods in forum General Automotive Classifieds/Wanted To Buy
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 23-12-2004, 08:26 PM
  2. WTB: HM Headers exhaust for VS sedan live-axle V8
    By IIV8II in forum General Automotive Classifieds/Wanted To Buy
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-11-2004, 10:20 AM
  3. FOR SALE:Hm Headers S/s Exhaust
    By mattvxwagon in forum General Automotive Classifieds/Wanted To Buy
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 10-07-2004, 11:40 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •