Page 15 of 22 FirstFirst ... 5 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 ... LastLast
Results 211 to 225 of 323

Thread: Fpv gt rspec

  1. #211
    MickStephens is offline Occasional Contributor to the Forums Last Online: 16-11-2013 @ 07:49 PM
    Member Since
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Werribee
    Age
    45
    Posts
    133

    Re: Fpv gt rspec

    I checked this out at Brocky's Big Day Out. Loks the goods and sounds pretty tough also.

    Cheers, Mick

  2. #212
    SUZUKI MALISHA is offline Occasional Contributor to the Forums Last Online: 14-02-2015 @ 03:54 AM
    Member Since
    Dec 2009
    Location
    ipswich
    Posts
    215

    Re: Fpv gt rspec

    Quote Originally Posted by macca_779 View Post
    People must be going bloody soft. I'll take outright performance over a bit of extra harshness anyday if buying in that segment. Sorry but I thought the GTS was meant to be the flagship "PERFORMNACE" model. Leave the senator for the Luxo sports comparisons. Fact is the R spec is the better performance car. Compare a GTS to a GT-P if you are going to weigh drivability so heavily in a comparison.

    As soon as you start to compare flagship performance cars on a racetrack you've drawn the line right there on what people want these cars for and what really matters.

    Would it be ok to compare a Calais to an SS in a performance test and then give it to the Calais as the overall better performance car even though its slower around a track, hell no.

    It's like guys who buy super sports bikes and only cruise around on them. They're bloody idiots. But a sports tourer ffs. But at least those bikes are clear on what they are made to do. So people will never expect an R1 to be a comfortable commuter.


    iPad 2 HD
    i totally agree..and ill raise you people are blind aswell. I mean people support some dodgy comfort biased review against a car that is the fastest aus has ever seen(by alot mind you) and dont flinch when it looses because it competitor handles smoother. PLENTY, thats what the mazda 3 class is for...people who want slow efficient cars....not fast roomy sedans. One second people agree the hsv won...then there saying that hsv will step up and catch up with their next model...

    oh and plenty... im sure as a keyboard warrior like urself would allready know my last vehicle was an R8 and my twin bro has a GT335...so i think for your info i can comment at a non biased level without having to explain myself to you.

    oh and plenty youve stopped suprizing me now...suggesting to take price out of a comparo with a car near half its price. Why would you do that????? If thats what it cost hsv to get a car round a track at "said time" then thats what it costs.

  3. #213
    LJCHSV's Avatar
    LJCHSV is offline Forum Contributor Last Online: 02-03-2015 @ 06:30 AM
    Member Since
    May 2005
    Location
    Port Melb
    Posts
    550

    Re: Fpv gt rspec

    This thread is still getting air play??? BOOOOORING.

  4. #214
    Pickles is offline Substantial Contributor to the Forum Last Online: 08-06-2025 @ 07:38 AM
    Member Since
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    5,339

    Re: Fpv gt rspec

    Quote Originally Posted by LJCHSV View Post
    This thread is still getting air play??? BOOOOORING.
    Excuse me.."black"....that's not what you told me the other day?!!
    Cheers Mate, Martin.

  5. #215
    Swordie is offline Fair Contributor to the Forums Last Online: 07-05-2025 @ 08:57 PM
    Member Since
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    1,594

    Re: Fpv gt rspec

    Reading Wheels seems Ford is very quick (around 0-100 4.5s) . HSV is more every day car where as FPV is track focused.

    FPV receives more attention. Would you want more attention (eg Police)?

    We should be glad we have such a great selection in Australia. Competition between two brands brings better and better cars.

    Seems both brands need to put more work into getting power to the ground. I wonder is at a point where more power doesn't make much difference? Probably more from stand still.

  6. #216
    Swordie is offline Fair Contributor to the Forums Last Online: 07-05-2025 @ 08:57 PM
    Member Since
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    1,594

    Re: Fpv gt rspec

    Reading Wheels seems Ford is very quick (around 0-100 4.5s) . HSV is more every day car where as FPV is track focused.

    FPV receives more attention. Would you want more attention (eg Police)?

    We should be glad we have such a great selection in Australia. Competition between two brands brings better and better cars.

    Seems both brands need to put more work into getting power to the ground. I wonder is at a point where more power doesn't make much difference? Probably more from stand still. Is it that's part of the definition of a Muscle car? More power than you need to over power the chassis. Toyota 86 could be seen as on other side of spectrum, not enough power to take full advantage of the chassis.
    Last edited by Swordie; 03-10-2012 at 10:30 AM.

  7. #217
    NezVim is offline Rarely Contributes to the Forum Last Online: 10-02-2013 @ 11:34 PM
    Member Since
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    24

    Re: Fpv gt rspec

    Interior is plain as ever, very poor for a performance car.

  8. #218
    macca_779's Avatar
    macca_779 is offline One of the Top Contributors to the Forum Last Online: 29-08-2024 @ 11:45 PM
    Member Since
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Micks Mum
    Age
    43
    Posts
    8,862

    Fpv gt rspec

    Quote Originally Posted by NezVim View Post
    Interior is plain as ever, very poor for a performance car.
    Think about what you just said. Who gives a shit. It's fast


    iPhone 5

  9. #219
    Plenty is offline Fair Contributor to the Forums Last Online: 15-04-2017 @ 06:26 PM
    Member Since
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Swanbourne
    Posts
    2,095

    Re: Fpv gt rspec

    Straight from the wiki dictionary!

    "A performance car is an automobile that is designed and constructed specifically for speed. The design and construction of a performance car involves not only providing a capable power train but also providing the handling and braking systems to support it.

    A performance car is not a straight line dragster like some narrow minded people believe, it's so much more than that and the HSV clearly on this and multiple other occasions has proved its the better car.

    Having driven both quite extensively myself the HSV is easily the better drive, especially when there is corners and hard stops involved.

  10. #220
    Martin_D is offline One of the Top Contributors to the Forum Last Online: 27-06-2022 @ 11:28 AM
    Member Since
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Adelaide South Australia
    Posts
    12,994

    Re: Fpv gt rspec

    Quote Originally Posted by Plenty View Post
    Straight from the wiki dictionary!
    "A performance car is an automobile that is designed and constructed specifically for speed. The design and construction of a performance car involves not only providing a capable power train but also providing the handling and braking systems to support it.
    Dont buy a Holden or a Ford then. They dont handle or stop.
    What they can kinda do is go in a straight line
    So maybe judge them on that?

  11. #221
    Plenty is offline Fair Contributor to the Forums Last Online: 15-04-2017 @ 06:26 PM
    Member Since
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Swanbourne
    Posts
    2,095

    Re: Fpv gt rspec

    Quote Originally Posted by Martin_D View Post
    Dont buy a Holden or a Ford then. They dont handle or stop.
    What they can kinda do is go in a straight line
    So maybe judge them on that?
    Actually a HSV GTS with the 6 piston brakes stops from 100km/h - 0km/h in around 35 meters....... i would say not to far off that Jap crap you always talk about.

    This is between FPV and HSV not a Mitsubishi or Subaru.....

    Find me a new car that weighs 1800Kg + that cost less than $90 000 with the straight line speed and handling of the two Aussie cars. Oh and has room to load up with 5 adults and luggage to suit!

    Apples with apples for what they are, they both handle very well..... And it's been said before the HSV does it better!

  12. #222
    lowfly is offline Rarely Contributes to the Forum Last Online: 05-03-2018 @ 09:02 AM
    Member Since
    May 2010
    Location
    carnarvon
    Posts
    21

    Re: Fpv gt rspec

    15 pages of bullsh#t, the new GT stock, not the R-Spec, is doing mid 12's for about 70k and that is as quick as the W427 priced at 100 and whatever k. This is the new benchmark in performance, get over it.

  13. #223
    Plenty is offline Fair Contributor to the Forums Last Online: 15-04-2017 @ 06:26 PM
    Member Since
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Swanbourne
    Posts
    2,095

    Re: Fpv gt rspec

    Quote Originally Posted by lowfly View Post
    15 pages of bullsh#t, the new GT stock, not the R-Spec, is doing mid 12's for about 70k and that is as quick as the W427 priced at 100 and whatever k. This is the new benchmark in performance, get over it.
    It is the new acceleration benchmark........ bunch of adolescent teens with white stains in their undies!

  14. #224
    Martin_D is offline One of the Top Contributors to the Forum Last Online: 27-06-2022 @ 11:28 AM
    Member Since
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Adelaide South Australia
    Posts
    12,994

    Re: Fpv gt rspec

    Quote Originally Posted by lowfly View Post
    15 pages of bullsh#t, the new GT stock, not the R-Spec, is doing mid 12's for about 70k and that is as quick as the W427 priced at 100 and whatever k. This is the new benchmark in performance, get over it.
    Boom! Someone sees the light

  15. #225
    Pickles is offline Substantial Contributor to the Forum Last Online: 08-06-2025 @ 07:38 AM
    Member Since
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    5,339

    Re: Fpv gt rspec

    Quote Originally Posted by Martin_D View Post
    Boom! Someone sees the light
    Exactly....as in Plenty's post 219...exactly.
    But having said that, I ain't a wrap for the HSV 25th Anniv. car either.....and, regardless of whether some on here bother to read motoring magazine road tests because they consider themselves better "judges" than motoring journos, I shall be very interested to read the comparison between these two cars when it happens...and surely it will?...
    Cheers, Pickles.
    Last edited by Pickles; 06-10-2012 at 07:52 AM.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. What is with ridiculous old FPV GT prices?
    By troytroy in forum General Automotive
    Replies: 33
    Last Post: 18-11-2010, 06:05 PM
  2. FPV-GT, I just ate one !
    By VX_CALAIS in forum General Automotive
    Replies: 95
    Last Post: 03-09-2008, 03:34 PM
  3. Tried a FPV GT today
    By GPT in forum General Automotive
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 04-03-2006, 08:11 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •