Quote Originally Posted by SUZUKI MALISHA View Post
u obviously have no idea these mag goes know nothing.they didnt even know all the rspec interior changes...they thought it was just a number beside the engine start. Calling the rspec suspension, aftermarket slapstick is a joke. Lookup for your own sake the comprehensive list whats been done. Faaar from aftermarket. And from my experience them saying the R8 doest ride hard is a joke. Even if the test car had the mrc on itd ride hard no matter what setting they tried. In that test the chrysler has by far the sofftest suspension setting when setup and it still went hard in there tests.

Im seriously willing to see results when they actually test the handling of these cars soon. And not some overated opinion from a guy who clearly was fazed by the ugly colour combo and didnt want to give it a chance.

Can see the headline now... "FPV GOES 5SECS FASTER AROUND SYDNEY MOTORPARK....BUT THE HSV WILL GET YOU TO YOUR SHOPPING IN STYLE AND COMFORT"
One of these days theyll do actual reputable testing and reviews which dont embarress us.
Lets see front suspension stiffer upper control arm bushes, stiffer upper strut mounts and retuned dampers, while the rear suspension gets higher spring rates, retuned dampers, a larger anti-roll bar and reinforced lower control arms.

All in all they did one thing, tried to take the "GT" from the "GT", they made a car that now has very little bump and rebound compliance trying to eliminate rear end float, which was another bad trait of the FG. I'd bet my last bag of lollies that it would suffer serious crash through from anything larger than the smallest of pot holes and ruts in the road.